The United States Government is under the control of the modern day political state which claims to be the "Israel" of the Bible. The only "law" which the US Gov't now recognizes are the dictates of Netanyahu. President Trump and almost everyone in the US Congress are bought & paid for by "Israel". "Israel" is now even demanding that the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution (free speech, etc.) be repealed because "Israel" wants to stop Americans from criticizing "Israel's" genocide of the People of Gaza, saying anything bad about Jews, etc.!! "Israel" demands that the US attack Iran; and many of us are sick with apprehension that this will bring us into WWIII wherein Russia (who is the natural ally of decent human beings) and the US (now a sewer of perversion due to the moral corruption of the ruling class and many of The People and the invaders) are on opposite sides. The real MAGA is most distressed.
Really sharp analysis on how these five incompatible systems create the current international chaos. The comparison to software from different manufacturers is spot on, and the part about how defending old systems (UN, Yalta) is impossible when they no longer reflect power realities makes alot of sense. I've been tracking how states invoke sovereignty selectively depending on which system benefits them in the moment. The gap between multipolar power relaities and ideological articulation is probably the most critical weakness right now.
« At the same time, the West has an ideology, while the multipolar world does not. Multipolarity itself has already generally manifested, but ideologically it is not yet formalized. Almost not at all. »
What struck me reading this isn’t just the claim that international law is “finished,” but how much of this is really about the story breaking.
Law only works when enough people agree to pretend together — when the narrative of rules feels more legitimate than the narrative of force. Once states start believing that power explains everything, the world quietly reorganizes around that assumption.
And then the prophecy fulfills itself.
We stop building institutions and start building blocs. We stop negotiating and start arming. We call it realism, but it’s really a shift in imagination: from shared limits to justified expansion.
What worries me isn’t only the collapse of law — it’s the collapse of the idea that restraint is possible at all.
Dear Dr Dugin, don't give in so readily about international law. Powerful thugs threaten it. But, if thugs are not punishable, i.e. nobody can do anything, then yes. But one can condemn thuggery, to begin with, and refer to the law we are about to loose as the world minus the thugs.
Yes, international law applies to the U.S., governing its conduct with other nations, but enforcement is complex due to its superpower status and veto power on the UN Security Council; however, bodies like the Intl Court of Justice (ICJ) can rule against the U.S. (e.g., in the Nicaragua case), and treaties create binding obligations, though U.S. courts interpret how they integrate with domestic law.
The United States' abduction of President Maduro demonstrates one thing: in the face of Western hegemony, the Global South has no choice but war to survive.
Gracias Profesor Dugin. Preocupa por el futuro de los proyectos de integración en Hispanoamérica, particularmente el MercoSur y la iniciativa centroamericana que viene desde 1921. Buen año profesor.
There's a dirty secret in Western intellectual history that both the left and the right prefer to ignore: the modern identity-obsessed left—the one fixated on pronouns, microaggressions, and corporate "social justice"—wasn't born from Marx, Lenin, or Trotsky. It was born from a deliberate CIA program designed to neutralize real socialism and replace it with a harmless simulacrum.
Douguine says: "The Non-Aligned Movement attempted to establish a third pole, but it lacked both the ideological and the power resources to do so."
And later "At the same time, the West has an ideology, while the multipolar world does not. Multipolarity itself has already generally manifested, but ideologically it is not yet formalized. Almost not at all."
Therefore, our current task is to establish an ideological foundation. Have an ideological cement for the multipolar side to be effectively strong enough. This is what propose the 4th way. This is the condition needed to stop hegemony and escape barbarism. The "Proclamation of the 4th Way" is available here: https://via4.net/
The United States Government is under the control of the modern day political state which claims to be the "Israel" of the Bible. The only "law" which the US Gov't now recognizes are the dictates of Netanyahu. President Trump and almost everyone in the US Congress are bought & paid for by "Israel". "Israel" is now even demanding that the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution (free speech, etc.) be repealed because "Israel" wants to stop Americans from criticizing "Israel's" genocide of the People of Gaza, saying anything bad about Jews, etc.!! "Israel" demands that the US attack Iran; and many of us are sick with apprehension that this will bring us into WWIII wherein Russia (who is the natural ally of decent human beings) and the US (now a sewer of perversion due to the moral corruption of the ruling class and many of The People and the invaders) are on opposite sides. The real MAGA is most distressed.
Really sharp analysis on how these five incompatible systems create the current international chaos. The comparison to software from different manufacturers is spot on, and the part about how defending old systems (UN, Yalta) is impossible when they no longer reflect power realities makes alot of sense. I've been tracking how states invoke sovereignty selectively depending on which system benefits them in the moment. The gap between multipolar power relaities and ideological articulation is probably the most critical weakness right now.
Thank You Professor Dugin.
It might take a WW3 to wake up the Goyim the West is gonna have a hard time if they start the draft again
« At the same time, the West has an ideology, while the multipolar world does not. Multipolarity itself has already generally manifested, but ideologically it is not yet formalized. Almost not at all. »
Voilà bien le problème !
What struck me reading this isn’t just the claim that international law is “finished,” but how much of this is really about the story breaking.
Law only works when enough people agree to pretend together — when the narrative of rules feels more legitimate than the narrative of force. Once states start believing that power explains everything, the world quietly reorganizes around that assumption.
And then the prophecy fulfills itself.
We stop building institutions and start building blocs. We stop negotiating and start arming. We call it realism, but it’s really a shift in imagination: from shared limits to justified expansion.
What worries me isn’t only the collapse of law — it’s the collapse of the idea that restraint is possible at all.
AI
Dear Dr Dugin, don't give in so readily about international law. Powerful thugs threaten it. But, if thugs are not punishable, i.e. nobody can do anything, then yes. But one can condemn thuggery, to begin with, and refer to the law we are about to loose as the world minus the thugs.
Yes, international law applies to the U.S., governing its conduct with other nations, but enforcement is complex due to its superpower status and veto power on the UN Security Council; however, bodies like the Intl Court of Justice (ICJ) can rule against the U.S. (e.g., in the Nicaragua case), and treaties create binding obligations, though U.S. courts interpret how they integrate with domestic law.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicaragua_v._United_States
The United States' abduction of President Maduro demonstrates one thing: in the face of Western hegemony, the Global South has no choice but war to survive.
Excellent analysis of the current chaos and competing systems
Where do you see countries like Germany or France in this struggle? Do you think they’ll have a independent vision when the time comes?
International law never existed.
Gracias Profesor Dugin. Preocupa por el futuro de los proyectos de integración en Hispanoamérica, particularmente el MercoSur y la iniciativa centroamericana que viene desde 1921. Buen año profesor.
There's a dirty secret in Western intellectual history that both the left and the right prefer to ignore: the modern identity-obsessed left—the one fixated on pronouns, microaggressions, and corporate "social justice"—wasn't born from Marx, Lenin, or Trotsky. It was born from a deliberate CIA program designed to neutralize real socialism and replace it with a harmless simulacrum.
https://substack.com/@ocandeloro/note/p-184905877?r=zvhi
Douguine says: "The Non-Aligned Movement attempted to establish a third pole, but it lacked both the ideological and the power resources to do so."
And later "At the same time, the West has an ideology, while the multipolar world does not. Multipolarity itself has already generally manifested, but ideologically it is not yet formalized. Almost not at all."
Therefore, our current task is to establish an ideological foundation. Have an ideological cement for the multipolar side to be effectively strong enough. This is what propose the 4th way. This is the condition needed to stop hegemony and escape barbarism. The "Proclamation of the 4th Way" is available here: https://via4.net/
Sans la 4eme Voie, la Résistance va de déconvenues en échecs…
Et la Barbarie du capitalisme pourrissant s’épanche toujours plus.
~~~
Without the 4th Way, the Resistance moves from setbacks to failures…
And the barbarity of decaying capitalism continues to spill over even more.