13 Comments
User's avatar
Joanna Martin's avatar

The United States Government is under the control of the modern day political state which claims to be the "Israel" of the Bible. The only "law" which the US Gov't now recognizes are the dictates of Netanyahu. President Trump and almost everyone in the US Congress are bought & paid for by "Israel". "Israel" is now even demanding that the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution (free speech, etc.) be repealed because "Israel" wants to stop Americans from criticizing "Israel's" genocide of the People of Gaza, saying anything bad about Jews, etc.!! "Israel" demands that the US attack Iran; and many of us are sick with apprehension that this will bring us into WWIII wherein Russia (who is the natural ally of decent human beings) and the US (now a sewer of perversion due to the moral corruption of the ruling class and many of The People and the invaders) are on opposite sides. The real MAGA is most distressed.

Expand full comment
The AI Architect's avatar

Really sharp analysis on how these five incompatible systems create the current international chaos. The comparison to software from different manufacturers is spot on, and the part about how defending old systems (UN, Yalta) is impossible when they no longer reflect power realities makes alot of sense. I've been tracking how states invoke sovereignty selectively depending on which system benefits them in the moment. The gap between multipolar power relaities and ideological articulation is probably the most critical weakness right now.

Expand full comment
Rodrigo Andrés's avatar

Thank You Professor Dugin.

Expand full comment
David Sanders's avatar

It might take a WW3 to wake up the Goyim the West is gonna have a hard time if they start the draft again

Expand full comment
Gildas Trégouët's avatar

« At the same time, the West has an ideology, while the multipolar world does not. Multipolarity itself has already generally manifested, but ideologically it is not yet formalized. Almost not at all. »

Voilà bien le problème !

Expand full comment
U. Ortego's avatar

What struck me reading this isn’t just the claim that international law is “finished,” but how much of this is really about the story breaking.

Law only works when enough people agree to pretend together — when the narrative of rules feels more legitimate than the narrative of force. Once states start believing that power explains everything, the world quietly reorganizes around that assumption.

And then the prophecy fulfills itself.

We stop building institutions and start building blocs. We stop negotiating and start arming. We call it realism, but it’s really a shift in imagination: from shared limits to justified expansion.

What worries me isn’t only the collapse of law — it’s the collapse of the idea that restraint is possible at all.

Expand full comment
Vidfamne's avatar

International law never existed.

Expand full comment
Enrique Dubon's avatar

Gracias Profesor Dugin. Preocupa por el futuro de los proyectos de integración en Hispanoamérica, particularmente el MercoSur y la iniciativa centroamericana que viene desde 1921. Buen año profesor.

Expand full comment
John Doe's avatar

The US won big. Here's a completely amoral look at what happened and why.

https://endtropy.substack.com/p/might-is-right-us-energy-imperialism?r=6xx7nz

Expand full comment
Stefano's avatar

Interesting analysis and walk down memory lane.

Unfortunately within this framing there is no space for parasites and transnational networks unaffiliated with nation-states.

Perhaps it would be wise to begin to integrate less tangible power centers to better understand the evolution of history since Westphalia, the Magna Carta, the fall of Constantinople, the end of Rome. Also, differently but related, Israel and eschatology.

Expand full comment
Being and Politics's avatar

Excellent analysis of the current chaos and competing systems

Expand full comment
Hartmut's avatar

Where do you see countries like Germany or France in this struggle? Do you think they’ll have a independent vision when the time comes?

Expand full comment
Han's avatar

Dear Dr Dugin, don't give in so readily about international law. Powerful thugs threaten it. But, if thugs are not punishable, i.e. nobody can do anything, then yes. But one can condemn thuggery, to begin with, and refer to the law we are about to loose as the world minus the thugs.

Expand full comment