11 Comments
User's avatar
Eric Fuleftists's avatar

The Soros/Popper imperative of an open society is a vile contradiction in terms. It is typical leftist inversion of moral and intellectual values. Such inversion is always derived from deceitful exclusionary definitions of 'democracy', 'tolerance', 'freedom', 'liberation', and 'equality', such that only those elements which support the leftist agenda are allowed to be included within it. All others are existential threats which must be eliminated in order to maintain the reframed circular definition.

This is the essence of leftism... it is self-referential, narcissistic, parasitic, sterile, subjective, and inevitably self-destructive, a totally closed system. It is the Serpent Ouroboros. It feeds on itself within a vicious feedback loop, representing itself to itself, always virtue signaling to its minions assimilated into the hivemind. Leftism inculcates madness, as wokusts double-down with endless circularity, doing the same thing over and over while expecting different results. It is an ideological Ponzi scheme, requiring all reality to succumb to it and celebrate its ravenous maw. Everything else that doesn't comport with such circular mentality must be doxxed and destroyed. There can be no Creator and no Logos of objective Truth, because those are externalities and true open systems requiring faith, that by their nature cannot be fully symbolized. The left require them to be reviled, hated, maligned, and eliminated, rejoicing in their destruction. To admit to them in any way is to be a sinner of the secular cult of woke leftism. And don't expect forgiveness, such is not the nature of the Beast.

In the face of this onslaught, the traditional right seem naive, complacent, oblivious, and helpless. The left understand why, they already know all this about us, and in a fit of yet more circularity, use our very nature against us. The woke left have progressively ramped up their game, provocation upon provocation over the last forty years, to the point where it is now make or break time, to pounce with the ultimate dialectic and finally seize all power.

'Wokusts are eager to sacrifice you, your family, and your entire society on the bloody altar of their Holy Narrative.'

Expand full comment
Mike richards's avatar

Well said!

Expand full comment
the long warred's avatar

Trump isn’t just shaking his fist, he’s moving all his pieces into position.

See here speech to the Generals 2:11:00

Hegseth laid down the standards and that the nonsense of the last 30 years is over.

Trump then gave the Generals their orders.

…there are subtle challenges to the Blue opposition and any really Blue Generals or Military in Trump’s “rambling” speech. FAFO, subtly,

Indirectly with stating the rules have changed, police and soldiers will hit back “They spit, we hit.”

To say the military and police in America - who are the same people same families generationally - to say they are conservative is correct.

To think they’re the Tea Party or Church ladies-

Is not correct.

Trump has said he doesn’t forgive, truly no leader can forgive, too many depend on the leader.

Expand full comment
the long warred's avatar

I said in 2022 Ukraine and Europe were strategic depth for Team Blue (Democratic Party, Globalists).

The same thing was True in the Roman Civil War, the provinces gave Pompey then later Cassius, Brutus Strategic Depth to stage and fight from, money, resources, soldiers. Pardon but Russia isn’t the primary target for Globalists, the West and America are the main object.

Expand full comment
the long warred's avatar

We don’t have to imagine, the mentally ill have been loose since the 1980s.

“Imagine millions of mentally ill people roaming the United States?”

Expand full comment
Phil Hasenkamp's avatar

Interesting read. I disagree with much of it. But it was interesting to navigate your thought processes, and now I have some rabbit holes to navigate regarding the origins of why people think a billionaire named George Soros is actively controlling elections.

Expand full comment
John Ryan's avatar

Is there a link to the original Russian transcript?

Expand full comment
John Lonergan's avatar

Oh, Alexander Dugin, the philosopher who mistook his tinfoil hat for a crown—spinning yarns of "liberal dictatorship" like it's the hottest new genre: dystopian fanfic meets fever dream. Newsflash, Sasha: "liberal dictatorship" is an oxymoron juicier than jumbo shrimp at a vegan potluck. Liberals? Those squishy souls who weep over endangered pronouns and hug trees? Dictatorship? That's for mustache-twirling tyrants who ban books, not binge-read them. It's like calling a gluten-free pizza a "fascist feast"—pure contradiction, served with a side of absurdity.

Take Moldova's elections: PAS snags 49% and 53 seats, opposition grabs the rest. Shocking! A ruling party loses ground without tanks rolling in? That's not "suspended democracy," it's... democracy doing its messy thing. Imprisoning a candidate? Banning parties? Sure, if you're scripting a Bond villain arc for Maia Sandu, the "Soros dandelion" (adorable, really—does she photosynthesize her plots?). But in reality, it's opposition drama, not a globalist gulag. And that diaspora vote suppression? Tragic logistics fail, not a Illuminati blackout. If only 10,000 out of 400,000 voted, blame the borscht lines, not the "totalitarian sect."

Dugin's Soros saga? It's QAnon with a Moscow accent: one billionaire puppeteering Europe like a deranged Geppetto, turning leaders into Pinocchios for the "open society." Hungary's Orbán laughs last, cozying up to Putin while cashing EU checks—liberal puppet? More like opportunistic sock puppet. And Trump's "epidemic of violence"? Buddy, that's America: guns, grudges, and garage sales. Restoring psych clinics? Bold, but let's not pretend liberals invented lunacy; conservatives have their own cult of personality.

Bottom line: Dugin's "civil war" wet dream ignores the punchline—liberals lose power via ballots, not bayonets. If that's dictatorship, I'll take two. Wake up, Alex: your multipolar multiverse is just sour grapes from the losing lane.

Expand full comment
Phil Hasenkamp's avatar

Does your argument stand on its own without ad hominem insults? Did he steal your girlfriend or something?

Expand full comment
John Lonergan's avatar

Just having a bit of fun.

Expand full comment
Mike richards's avatar

F-off, sicko - have your ‘fun’ somewhere else. And you lie. You were not ‘just having a bit of fun’.

Expand full comment