Discussion about this post

User's avatar
TK's avatar
4hEdited

I think that this strategic, geo-political perspective of Russian Vs 'The West', (where, is there anybody who thinks these derangements in EU and USA represent what we have ever called 'The West' (and what happened to Russia, from the time it produced Tchaikovsky as a assertion of cultural power vis a vis European, mostly German composers; to become so antagonistic to the natural path of 'Western' -> Russia AND USA were the corrupters of Europe, remember, in World War 2? USA provided the Central Bank and lending, remember?) is highly misrepresented as philosophy.

This attempt to cleave Russia free is not totally honest.

It was USA and Russia that destroyed the anti-Ba'al, anti-Banking entity of Nazi Germany; and who accepted the US Federal Reserve Money to do so -> were an ACTIVE ROLE in developing this empire.

So let's just establish that first and foremost; but then after that fact, isn't the more interesting thing to be above that to recognise or establish the events occurring above that, including the events that must occur?

We'd say we have been - including and especially Russia - in the enlightenment-materialist epoch into which the zero-sum, materialist socio-political reality was pre-eminent, leading to a collapse into insanity. Right so Russia was there, now we are there, but so what? Now is the time to twist the knife?

When do we figure out how to surpass the Capital and its materialist metaphysics? Isn't it entirely possible for me to have a philosophy, and you to have the same philosophy, but yet we fight to the death if enemies, for any number of (reasons that must be valid not flippant like Trump here), but the philosophy itself remains intact?

Wouldn't that be the higher order?

No posts

Ready for more?