I find it "refreshing", whether you agree with the thesis in whole or part, to reacquaint myself with ground not seen since my days as an undergraduate/graduate. The Philosophy of History has always been of great interest to me and this article covers 80-90% of the relevant material. One can argue emphasis or interpretation but I believe on cannot dispute the topics (and the personal resolution of those topics) that form a mature "World View".
Thank you for the post!
I find it "refreshing", whether you agree with the thesis in whole or part, to reacquaint myself with ground not seen since my days as an undergraduate/graduate. The Philosophy of History has always been of great interest to me and this article covers 80-90% of the relevant material. One can argue emphasis or interpretation but I believe on cannot dispute the topics (and the personal resolution of those topics) that form a mature "World View".