Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Patrick Mary Gallagher's avatar

Excellent.

Rather Curmudgeonly's avatar

You are spot on about our past - the American tradition is rooted in an English tradition (that the English elite have been working harder than our own elite to cast overboard). The entire notion of rights from those traditions is highly specific, not universal. It is the universalization of "human rights", that are truly an Anglo-American cultural product, is where we've gone astray - particularly with Wilsonian internationalism (perhaps the cornerstone of the unipolar conceit and tied to Protestant theology).

Which leads to where you go wrong. We are not a nation of blood heritage, we have an Enlightenment credal heritage. That heritage is open to people who do not look like us or originate from a small set of countries, but aspire to the same things. We are a nation of cast-offs (really, what the hell better description is there of a Puritan?) and misfits (people who wanted what their native societies would not grant them - liberty most pre-eminently). Where that has gone wrong is with the abandonment of the melting pot view of America in favor of a clan/tribal reconstitution. By applying a blood heritage, you are indulging in the same error as the cultural left that has rejected the traditional process of assimilation.

6 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?