4 Comments
User's avatar
eleni's avatar

Quoting Ted Kaczynski to critique society is like citing an arsonist on fire safety. His words weren’t arguments; they were part of a campaign that killed people.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Apr 22
Comment deleted
eleni's avatar

You don’t get to separate the ‘ideas’ from the bombs. His violence wasn’t incidental, it was the vehicle for his message; calling that ‘effective’ isn’t analysis, it’s moral drift….and fundamentally flawed. Just like the founder of Earth Day. A murderer.

Cas Corach's avatar

If we cannot separate the man from the ideas then most ideas will be condemned by any moral standard. All of our nations and 'freedoms' were achieved by violence it must be remembered. I agree though that violence ought not to be idolised and it complicates Kaczynski's legacy to a great degree

LEON TSVASMAN's avatar

Civilizations turn when meaning finds carriers with leverage.

Not interpreters alone. Not managers of discourse. Not prestige functionaries of the already intelligible.

The decisive figures are those able to recognize a deeper order without exploiting it, and to act from it without translating it back into the symbolic opportunism of the age they inherit.

That separation has begun.

For those who can read it:

https://leontsvasmansapiognosis.substack.com/p/the-prevented-elite

— Leon Tsvasman