"For things to manifest in that way, consciousness must be a priori permeated with an ideal, Platonic capacity related to ordering."
Yes, there must a Plato orderer, or should I say orchestrator, lurking beneath the cerebellum, structuring qualia in the flux of natural manifold. How grand, Luigi! Trouble is: cognitive science disproves this thesis. There is no Plato at all. He is busy buggering young athenians.
I said it right there, it is not to be found in the brain because it's not individual, nor species-specific.
But if the measuring apparatus affects the objects of measurament, then the possibility of objective experience goes through us. They are permanent outside of us as long as they struggle against us - and vice-versa.
Entity realism is not to be denied. But even if the system is defined by the environment on a certain level, the former must carry more complexity than the latter in order to not be absorbed. It's a principle of cybernetics. I appreciate your contribution.
"The (cybernetic) map is not the territory." In other words, the environment (nature) is always greater than the system (i.e.nation) that it nourishes. The comparative valorisation of the "system" is a political, not a scientific, imperative. An attempt to fixate, however precariously, an essence (civilisational). I believe in epistemological fidelity. Cybernetics, systems theory and complexity theory originate in domains that have little to do with political-historical life. To transpose them requires translation and translation is always inaccurate. But that is a long discussion. Thanks for your reply.
Reminds me of Stalin’s speech to Red Army cadre
"For things to manifest in that way, consciousness must be a priori permeated with an ideal, Platonic capacity related to ordering."
Yes, there must a Plato orderer, or should I say orchestrator, lurking beneath the cerebellum, structuring qualia in the flux of natural manifold. How grand, Luigi! Trouble is: cognitive science disproves this thesis. There is no Plato at all. He is busy buggering young athenians.
I said it right there, it is not to be found in the brain because it's not individual, nor species-specific.
But if the measuring apparatus affects the objects of measurament, then the possibility of objective experience goes through us. They are permanent outside of us as long as they struggle against us - and vice-versa.
Entity realism is not to be denied. But even if the system is defined by the environment on a certain level, the former must carry more complexity than the latter in order to not be absorbed. It's a principle of cybernetics. I appreciate your contribution.
"The (cybernetic) map is not the territory." In other words, the environment (nature) is always greater than the system (i.e.nation) that it nourishes. The comparative valorisation of the "system" is a political, not a scientific, imperative. An attempt to fixate, however precariously, an essence (civilisational). I believe in epistemological fidelity. Cybernetics, systems theory and complexity theory originate in domains that have little to do with political-historical life. To transpose them requires translation and translation is always inaccurate. But that is a long discussion. Thanks for your reply.